Using Holography and LEDs to Make Art

A while back, I had the opportunity to visit the studio of San Francisco artist Christine Remy, who creates holographic portraits and LED sculptures. Much of her art is subtle and contemplative, however, she has two projects that I found striking and even emotionally jarring.  One is a series of holographic portraits that are larger than life. The video doesn’t go into the details (and shows only one portrait), but the holographic series is composed of three-dimensional, animated images of a trio grieving women. As you move around the portraits, you get a different perspective of the women’s faces and their grief.

The other project is a persistence-of-vision piece in which a line of LEDs projects a life-sized image of a girl into air. It’s eerie because you can only catch glimpses of the girl out of the corner of your eye. Her presence if fleeting; it feels like you’re sharing the room with a ghost.

I kept the video short, trying to highlight as many projects as possible, but in doing so, I only touched on the wide range of Remy’s art, her motivation, and the technology behind it. If you’re interested in seeing more of her work, you can go to christineremyart.com. If you’re in San Francisco, I highly recommend a visit to her studio in the Mission District–the best way to experience her art is to see it in person.

The Return of the Raster

Shameful but true: I own and watch a CRT TV, in all of its big, boxy glory. This might be a sore spot for someone who has recently immersed herself in the study of Displays & Screens, but my reasoning is solid. The TV works, the display area is large, and the picture is beautiful. Also, I invested a fair amount of money in a delightful cabinet to house the set and its peripherals. This TV and cabinet have a few more years to go before I can justify the investment and annoyance of rearranging my living room to accommodate a flat panel display.

So, in light of my adherence to the CRT, it makes sense that I’m happy to report that the old tube technology is finding new life in a new type of display called laser phosphor display. LPD appears to have some of the advantages of more modern displays, but with a fraction of the power requirements. Both CRT and LPD raster images onto a phosphor, but where a CRT uses an electron beam, guided by a magnetic field, to activate the phosphor coating, LPD uses lasers, guided by a mirror.

Wade Roush, a friend and former Technology Review colleague, broke the story of Prysm, the LPD startup last week. I’ll be writing a story for Technology Review about the technology, adding some perspective from display experts and explaining a bit more of the technology. Stay tuned!

I got it in college and went on to buy an expensive (and beautiful) cabinet to hide it in, and just haven’t bothered to upgrade

On Crashing a CES Party

As this year’s Consumer Electronics Show wraps up, I’m reminded of a memorable night at a CES a few years back when I won big on nickel slots and crashed an intense laser TV party at the Palms.

I wasn’t invited to Mitsubishi’s Laser TV party at CES 2008, one of the most anticipated parties at the show that year. And it wasn’t for lack of trying. Before CES, I’d called and emailed Mitsubishi’s PR, and at the show I visited the company’s booth and hunted down on-site PR representatives. Basically, they all gave me the same answer. No can do, they said, if you’re not on the list, you can’t go to the party. To make matters worse, I didn’t even know where the party was, and I didn’t know how to find out.*

It was all quite frustrating to me because I had recently written a rather good article for Technology Review about the actual lasers that were to be used in laser TV. The technology was interesting and impressive to me. Plus, I was curious to see if laser TV would live up to its promise of vivid high-dynamic range, and amazingly crisp images.

On the night of the Mitsubishi party, all seemed lost. I had given up and started to pump nickels into a slot machine when I improbably won $44.70. Was my luck changing? After I collected my cash, I walked outside and saw a line of bus vans with their destinations posted in the windows, and one of them was going to the “Mitsubishi Laser TV” party. Jackpot. The ride was leaving in 10 minutes, the driver told me. So I strolled around for a bit and then joined a group of guys who stepped aboard just as the bus van was leaving.

Once at the Palms, we were guided by the kindly, young PR rep who had to endure the annoying (drunk) conversation of the group of men on the bus van. She seemed to seek me out as a fellow sufferer-in-sober-misogyny as we walked into the hotel. It was a good allegiance to make because an ally is often an appropriate substitute for a party invitation.

At the registration desk it was revealed that I wasn’t on the list. I put a quizzical look on my face–furrowed brow and a forced frown–and instantly my PR ally stepped in to “clear it up.”

We took an elevator up to the top floor of the Palms. The doors opened onto a cramped bar that was slightly wider than a hallway. I asked my PR friend if she could introduce me to someone who could talk about the technology behind the TV. She seemed skeptical and then came back with a Mitsubishi executive who avoided using any specifics when answering my questions. After the fruitless interview, I took my reporter’s notebook and explored the rest of the party.

In the main party room, there was one  65-inch laser TVs on display and only a few people left over from the main event–I had missed the official unveiling. Instantly, though, I knew that main room was not where I wanted to be: suited executives sipped cocktails in booths as barely clothed women danced on ledges above them. And the laser TV played on.  I quickly left the room to find something else to look at.

Luckily, there was another laser TV on display in a side room. And the video was 3D. I joined the crowd and was handed a pair of shutter glasses** to watch U2’s 3D concert. Bono kept reaching out to grab me, and I started to get a headache, so I handed in my glasses and continued to explore.

Going up to the mezzanine level, I  looked down at the main room again. The drinking men were gone, but the dancing women were still there. The mezzanine had access to the roof, and this is where I found the party’s producer. He had put all of this together, he told me. He also admitted that he was quite impressed by the laser TV. The thing they’re not talking about, he said, is how energy-efficient laser TV is. I nodded in agreement because I knew that in theory he was right. Soon our conversation dried up and we both just silently looked out on the desert cityscape, watching lights flash from the giant casino-hotel boxes. Finally I excused myself and left the party.

At the base of the Palms, I stood in a line for about 15 minutes to catch a cab. Amazingly, my driver was the same one who had taken me to the show in the morning. I was astonished at the coincidence, but my driver acted like it wasn’t a big deal. I asked him if it had ever happened to him before, trying to prove how astounding a coincidence it was, and he admitted that it had not. Still, he guided the conversation to the book that he was writing and his girlfriend was illustrating, and how he’s only going to be driving a cab for a little bit longer. At my hotel I paid the driver the fare, told the him goodnight, and went up to my room to file a blog post about laser TV.***

*At that time, I didn’t have a strong network of tech journalist buddies who could clue me in.

**The glasses synchronize with an infrared signal that comes from the TV.

***While you can buy Mitsubishi’s laser TV, called Laservue, for about $4, 000, the displays have not significantly shaken up the market. A great source of laser TV updates is here.

Reporter’s Notebook: The Hunt for the Perfect Screen

(Updated 12:08 p.m. January 8, 2010 to include quantum dots as an upcoming display technology)

My survey of display tech, “The Hunt for the Perfect Screen,” was posted at Gizmodo a couple of weeks ago. It was a fun piece to write because it helped me see how much I’ve actually learned about screens like holographic systems, energy-efficient LCDs, bright and beautiful OLEDs, and lightweight plastic displays and their manufacturing. Most of it is fairly mind-blowing stuff. And it reminds me why I’m happy to be a technology reporter–I get to spend my time looking at the future.

The hardest part of writing the piece, unsurprisingly, was pruning the prose. There are a lot of specific technologies that I left out for the sake of flow and length. Below is a short list of topics that didn’t make it into the article.

I plan to expand on some of these omitted topics in the future.

And now for a reporting outtake. Below is an anecdote on how a company I mentioned in the Giz article got its name.

  • On the naming of Phicot: The company that’s trying to commercialize HP’s plastic electronics manufacturing process is called Phicot. When I asked Carl Taussig of HP what Phicot means, he told that one of the researchers has a son who, when he was an infant, would pick up objects and call them all the same word, something that sounded like “phicot.” A toy truck? Phicot. A book? Phicot. A piece of food? Phicot. The parents started to worry about the child’s intelligence, says Taussig. But when the boy grew up and was able to enunciate better, they learned that he was simply saying, “Look what I’ve got.” Which is also something you might say to people if you have a display manufactured by the company. Cute.

    How Quantum Dots Will Make LCDs Better

    Quantum dots, suspended in solution

    Quantum dots are tiny nanocrystals that emit pure, bright light. For decades they’ve mainly been lab curiosities, but now QD Vision, an MIT spinoff, is using quantum dots to improve the color and efficiency of liquid-crystal displays.

    I caught up with Seth Coe Sullivan, co-founder and CTO of QD Vision, at the Printed Electronics 2009 conference last week in San Jose. We talked about quantum dots in lighting (click here for the Q&A) and in LCDs. Below is an edited Q&A with Sullivan about quantum dots for LCD backlighting.

    Kate Greene: Quantum dots will be in lighting products early next year. What’s next?

    Seth Coe Sullivan: In 2011, we’ll be launching a display product. It’s still a quantum light optic, but it’ll be augmenting LED light in the backlight of displays. We’re basically doing spectral engineering, designing the spectrum of a light source to be perfect for the application. With solid-state lighting, we are focusing on the human eye’s perception of white. With displays we’re focused on creating red, green, and blue, but in particular red and green color channels in LCD to give a high color gamut, high power efficiency, while again reducing cost because we’re saving manufacturers LEDs.

    KG: So where does the optic fit in an LCD?

    SCS: If you look at an LCD today, you’ll see that they typically use white LEDs as a backlight. It’s a blue chip with yellow phosphor. So what happens is you get this nice broad yellow peak that fills out the spectrum and make it look roughly white. Then what you’re doing is putting it through a color filter because you want separate red and green channels. There’s a little red light in the yellow phosphor, and there’s a little bit of green light in yellow phosphor, so what LCD manufacturers are doing is using really spectrally broad color filters to let as much light through as possible. It hurts color quality, or color gamut in this case.

    KG: So quantum dots replace filters?

    SCS: No, they’re still going to use filters, we’re just going to take out the yellow phosphor, which is adding very little value but solving a need, and adding red and green quantum dots. It’s still going to be white light, but it’s going to tri-chromatic white that’s optimized for filters to maximize the throughput through the filters, as opposed to bi-chromatic light that’s getting chopped into tri-chromatic by the filters.

    KG: So if you did spectral analysis of your laptop backlight, it’d look blue and yellow?

    SCS: Before the color filters, yeah.

    KG: And then after the color filters it’s red, green, and blue?

    SCS: Yeah. You’re taking this broad band and chopping it into pieces, and it’s extremely lossy. The white LEDs don’t put the photons where LCD really need it.

    KG: How does this get integrated into manufacturing of an LCD.

    SCS: Right now LCD makers buy white LEDs, integrate them into light bars, which is a bunch of LEDs on a strip, and those are coupled to the edge of a light guide plate which spreads the light. What we do is sell a quantum light optic that goes between the blue LEDs now and the light guide plate. So blue light gets converted into tri-chromatic white light and then gets couple into the light guide.

    KG: They just have to buy blue LEDs instead of white LEDs with phosphor?

    SCS: Yes. We aren’t selling the integrated LED. We’ll sell the optic.

    KG: What sort of improvements can using a quantum light optic give to an LCD?

    SCS: There’s a potential of 30 to 40 percent increase in power efficiency. Color gamut goes from about 80 percent of the standard gamut to over 100 percent. So all of a sudden your TV is as good as your CRT [cathode ray tube] was 10 years ago in terms of color. And there’s manufacturing cost savings to LCD makers, which is a big deal. Those guys operate at such thin margins, even giving them a few points is doubling their profitability potentially.

    KG: Which LCD companies are you working with?

    SCS: I can’t give any particular names, but we’re working with three of the five major LCD companies.

    KG: It’s a clever to improve displays like this without  re-engineer the entire device.

    SCS: The display industry is completely motivated by cost, so it’s got to be really simple. What’s so compelling for us is that the materials we’re developing in solid state lighting—the packaging, the technology, the manufacturing processes—are going to be identical. For a small company chewing off very big markets—and both lighting and displays are $100 billion markets—it’s important that there’s a lot of synergy in terms of processes, materials, and manufacturing.

    KG: Lighting and displays both use quantum dots that are activated by light, not electric current. What about full quantum-dot displays that are powered by electricity?

    SCS: They’ll largely be on the military side for the Department of Defense, where they’re willing to perhaps pay a little more to solve a critical life-saving need. We’ll do that as opposed to competing right up against LCD. The OLED [organic light-emitting diode] guys are learning just how hard that is. How many decades have they been going at it? They’ve got a compelling technology, but cost, manufacturing scale, and building fabs it’s hard to compete with LCD.

    This is the second of two Q&As with Sullivan about QD Vision products. The first Q&A focused on improving lighting with quantum dots. For my story in Technology Review about quantum dots for LCDs, go here.

    Improving the Look of LED Lighting

    QD Vision, an MIT spinout, is commercializing quantum dots, tiny crystals that emit bright light of a particular color. Because quantum dots shine at specific colors, a layer of them can be added to an LED to alter its original color. This is exactly QD Vision’s first product: quantum dots that makes white LED lights, famous for their erie hue, look better.

    The quantum dot lighting solution is relatively simple: Adding red quantum dots to a white LED makes the resulting white light appear warmer. Light from the LED gives electrons in the quantum dots an energetic boost for a short time; when the electrons return to their lower energy state, they emit a photon, a process called photoluminescence.  (Photoluminescence is in contrast to electroluminescence, in which electric current, not light, excites electrons.)

    I caught up with the founder of QD Vision, Seth Coe Sullivan, at the Printed Electronics 2009 conference in San Jose last week to ask him a few questions about lighting. Below is an edited version of our conversation:

    Kate Greene: What quantum dot products are you selling right now?

    Seth Coe Sullivan, founder of QD Vision (front)

    Seth Coe Sullivan, founder of QD Vision (front)

    Seth Coe Sullivan: Today, we’re commercially shipping a quantum light optic. It’s essentially a light-emitting filter: a plate of glass with quantum dots printed on top. We sell it to a couple of customers. One is a fixture company, and one is a lamp company called Nexxus. They make Edisonian-mount lamps, so you can screw the lamp into the same mount you screw an incandescent bulb into. The Nexxus lamp used to have a diffuse filter plate on the top of it. With our product, they just take that plate out, and put the quantum light optic in its place. You get to transform the color without paying any price in terms of efficiency. You have the color of incandescent lighting with the efficiency of LED lighting.

    KG: The optic is emissive, and so it doesn’t decrease efficiency like a filter?

    SCS: Right. We’re using blue photons from the LEDs and making red photons from the quantum dots. In theory you could make the lamp four times as bright by going from blue to red. But we’re not using all the blue light from the LEDs. We’re just making a little bit of red to tweak the spectrum.

    KG: Okay, give me a quick definition of quantum dots.

    SCS: A quantum dot is a semiconductor nanocrystal that we synthesize in a chemical solution. When you make semiconductors very small, the quantum physics dominates the conventional semiconductor physics. So size matters. A quantum dot, made of the semiconductor cadmium selenide, that is six nanometers in size emits red light, one that’s four nanometers emits green, and one that’s two nanometers emits blue.

    KG: How long have they been around?

    SCS: They date back to the 80s. But there’s really been a series of improvements of efficiency and stability so that all of a sudden quantum dots have crossed the line in commercial relevance. The first applications were all in biology. They were used to tag sections of cells and other things. Then there was a Christmas tree light product that predated us. It’s neat, but it doesn’t provide any actual value to the world. Still, it was great to see them put something on the market.

    KG: But in terms of a major commercial product, QD Vision has the first?

    SCS: We really are the first to put something in a mainstream market where you’re adding value to the world. By making LED lighting, which is the most efficient lighting technology in the world, something that’s pleasing to consumers, all of a sudden you can drive adoption of LED technology.  LEDs make up less than one percent of lighting right now. Philips talks about it being 80 percent in 2020. That’s massive growth in the next 10 years, but in order for that to happen, people have to want to buy them. It’s not enough to be efficient. They have to look good too. We think we’ve solved that problem, and we’re talking to all the major players to build quantum light optics into their products.

    KG: What’s the change in cost to add a quantum light optic?

    SCS: It’s actually a reduction in their manufacturing cost. Nexxus is actually going to offer products at same price, but that just means they’ve improved their margins by increasing their efficiency. When you look at these things, you always need to do an apples-to-apples comparison. I’m comparing our product, with the high color quality that it has, with trying to make the same color quality with any other technology. Because we’re doing that with roughly 30 percent more efficiency, you’re using 30 percent fewer LEDs to produce the same number of lumens. By putting in a quantum light optic instead of 30 percent more LEDs, you take all that cost out. When you add the cost of quantum light optic in there and the net result should be reduction in main cost.

    KG: Can I buy a quantum-dot light today?

    SCS: Almost. We are shipping to our customers. Our customers then have to make a lamp or a fixture, sell them to their distributors, and then their distributors have to sell them to end customers who have to install them. Right now that hasn’t sold all the way through. For example, the Nexxus product will be the first quantum lighting product sold on bulbs.com. So probably in late January or early February you’ll be able to go to that site and purchase a Nexxus array lamp with a quantum light optic inside.

    KG: Will it be expensive?

    SCS: I’m told the retail price will probably be $100.

    KG: How does that compare to other LED lighting?

    SCS: It’s extremely competitive within LED lighting. LED costs more than other lighting technologies. An incandescent bulb of the type we’re talking about might be $3. A compact florescent might be between  $5 and $10, so a $100 light bulb is an investment. But this bulb isn’t meant for you and me, in our homes today.  It’s for people who look at total cost of ownership model when they install lighting. So if you’re a building owner, you look at the cost of bulb and also the electricity to run it, the maintenance cost to replace it,  and the future bulbs you’re going to have to buy. If you look at total 50,000-hour life of our product, you’ll need five compact florescent bulbs or 25 halogen or incandescent bulbs. Then you add in the cost of the guy climbing the ladder to change the bulb, it pays you back in 12 to 18 months.

    KG: What’s next for quantum-dot lighting?

    SCS: With existing customers, we will expand the product line offering. So we do that in terms of different colors temperatures offered. 2700 K is the temperature that describes what an incandescent bulb produces. That’s what we’re offering now. But we can also do 3000K, 3500K, 4100K products.

    KG: Who are your other customers?

    Seth Coe Sullivan (back)

    Seth Coe Sullivan (back)

    SCS: We’re working with all the lighting majors. Lighting is an extremely fragmented market. We do have a lot of different customers that are in the design cycle to launch products in 2010.

    This is the first of two Q&As with Sullivan about QD Vision products. The second Q&A will focus on improving liquid-crystal displays with quantum dots.

    Polaroid’s New Instant Camera

    The digital camera revolution was a little rocky for Polaroid, a company famous for an iconic film camera that prints photos instantly. But thanks to the invention of a new type of thermal printer, the company now has a instant digital camera, the Pogo. I’ve had the chance to play around with one for a couple of weeks* and I have some thoughts. First the bad:

    • The camera is big and boxy, much like a Walkman from the ’80s.
    • The 2″ x 3″ photo paper is loaded into the body of the camera, but when you shake the camera the paper moves around. Technically this isn’t a problem, but it’s still disconcerting to hear things moving inside.
    • The user interface is awkward and slow compared to the other cameras–Pentax, Canon, and Nikon– that I’m used to using.

    Now the good:

    • It is AWESOME to be able to print out a picture and give it to a person on the spot. People are so used to having their picture taken and resigning themselves to the fact that they may never see it again. Maybe it will be posted on Flickr or Facebook, maybe not. It’s been surprisingly fun and rewarding to give a physical picture to someone immediately.
    • These cameras aren’t very well known yet, so there’s a nice novelty to them.
    • The photo paper is relatively cheap. You can buy a pack of 30 for $10.
    • I’ve found that I enjoy thinking of fun and clever uses for the pictures like putting together flip books or hiding pictures of me making funny faces around the house for my partner to find.

    My main recommendation to Polaroid is to change the form factor of the PoGo. I understand that the camera has to be a little bigger than the average point-and-shoot to accommodate the internal printer and paper, but why not have a little fun? Urban Outfitters sells bigger, vintage-looking digital cameras that the cool kids really love. Imagine how much more they’d love these cameras if they printed photos too!

    *Disclosure: the PoGo sells for $199, but I got mine as a free gift for participating as a judge in a design contest for the Zink thermal printer.

    Topographic Sculpture of Kansas

    SchepmannFarmTopoMy friend Dan, who helped me build the light pipe prototype, recently got a CNC mill. He’s been asking me if there’s anything I want to make with it, and now I think I have an idea.

    My in-laws live on a farm close to Holyrood, Kansas, damn near the geographic center of the United States. I thought it’d be cool to use the mill to carve, out of wood, a topographic representation of the land around the farm. Now, this being Kansas, there isn’t much change in elevation, but there are some pretty streams and enough variation, I think, to be interesting if we tweak the scale a bit.

    Inspiration for this project came from jewelry designer, Erik Maes, who makes very cool topographic belt buckles.

    Bringing Stretchable Silicon to Market

    When I interview researchers about their projects, I usually ask for a product timeline. It’s not an entirely fair question because researchers rarely have much control over commercialization. It’s a boring question too because they usually answer, “three to five years.”  Still, I like to include these estimates in my stories to keep readers, many of whom aren’t familiar with R&D and product timelines, from getting too excited about the prospect of something like a quantum computer appearing under the Christmas tree.

    Given the gap between research and commercialization, I’m excited to give an update on research I first covered in early 2006. A startup called MC10, based in Waltham, MA, will be making products from stretchable, single-crystalline silicon, the high-quality stuff that’s used in computer chips, within the next 18 months.

    The great thing about stretchable single-crystalline silicon is that it can do anything chips can do now–sensing, processing, communicating–but it can do it in unusual shapes. Imagine a surgeon’s gloves that read a patient’s pH, a sheet of high-quality electrodes that can conform around the brain of a person with epilepsy, and a camera chip in the shape of an eye. Stretchable silicon can make these things happen.

    There are other sorts of flexible electronics, but they are generally made of organic materials, which are printed or painted on flexible substrates. Organic electronics are easy to make, but aren’t as fast as silicon electronics.

    MC10 is commercializing work from John Rogers’ group* at the University of Illinois. I wrote a story for Technology Review about the proof of principle: silicon becomes stretchy when it is thinned and cut into ribbons. These ribbons are then adhered to a rubber-like substrate that’s pre-stretched. When the rubber relaxes, the silicon forms waves, but does not crack. The rubber can be stretched and relaxed many times without degrading the silicon. Rogers showed the electrical properties of this wavy silicon are just as good as silicon on a rigid substrate.

    stretchable silicon

    Since this initial research, the group has made a number of working devices that can conform to different form factors and unusual shapes. David Icke, the head of MC10, gave a presentation at Printed Electronics 2009 on Thursday in which he provided an overview of stretchable silicon applications.

    One project that the company will focus on is making skin for robots that perceives distance and senses pressure. Computer vision from cameras can get a robot hand only so far, Icke said. When it gets close to an object, it needs to adjust at a fine scale. Likewise, when a robot hand grabs an object, it needs to know the pressure it’s applying at all contact points. No one wants to be crushed between robot fingers.

    After the talk, I caught up with Icke to ask exactly how they are adding perception to robot hands**. He says they’re building infrared emitters and sensors into a stretchable sheet that can be stretched over a robotic hand. The sensors pick up infrared light that’s scattered when it hits an object.

    The early products, Icke says, will most likely be high-margin and low-volume. In other words, the company will focus on specialized gadgets, built for a specific customer, like spherical cameras for the U.S. military. So even though stretchable silicon products are on their way, it’ll be a while before you and I can get our hands on them.

    *Rogers is a really nice guy, and one of the better science communicators I’ve ever come across. Rightfully, he was awarded a MacArthur Fellowship this year.

    **Another way to add perception to a robot hand is being explored at Intel by Josh Smith. He’s built a robotic hand that detects an electric field, which is useful when in proximity to conducting materials like bottles of water or a human body. See a video here.

    Printed Electronics 2009: DARPA Projects

    Dev Shenoy, program manager at DARPA, gave a good keynote presentation at the Printed Electronics 2009 conference today, highlighting some of the printed electronics projects that the agency supports.

    Printed Spintronic Memory: This project aims to replace all other types of data storage–magnetic hard disk, flash, DRAM, MRAM, SRAM, etc., with one type storage to rule them all. It’s called spin torque-transfer memory, or STT-RAM for short, and it uses the spin of electrons to store data. DARPA is supporting projects to print STT-RAM using organic materials–a first. The claim is that STT-RAM could be 100 times more energy-efficient than SRAM and 100,000 more energy efficient than flash.

    Eye-shaped Camera: The curved shape of an eye is a great example of how a simple design provides exceptional performance. A flat camera sensor can’t match the field of view we have with our eyes. DARPA is interested in spherical cameras because one round camera could replace three flat cameras in an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), according to Shenoy. Since traditional chip manufacturing processes are done on flat surfaces, DARPA is trying to figure out a way to print camera components on a curved surface.
    (I’ve written about related work on an eye-shaped camera here and an electronic contact lens here.)

    Flexible X-ray: One problem with x-ray detectors are that they are expensive and too large to lug around on the battle field. So DARPA is funding projects (at PARC and GE) to print x-ray sensors on a flexible, lightweight sheet.

    Copyright © kategreene.net
    Science and Technology and Other Stuff

    Built on Notes Blog Core
    Powered by WordPress