Tag Printed Electronics 2009

How Quantum Dots Will Make LCDs Better

Quantum dots are tiny nanocrystals that emit pure, bright light. For decades they’ve mainly been lab curiosities, but now QD Vision, an MIT spinoff, is using quantum dots to improve the color and efficiency of liquid-crystal displays.

I caught up with Seth Coe Sullivan, co-founder and CTO of QD Vision, at the Printed Electronics 2009 conference last week in San Jose. We talked about quantum dots in lighting (click here for the Q&A) and in LCDs. Below is an edited Q&A with Sullivan about quantum dots for LCD backlighting.

Kate Greene: Quantum dots will be in lighting products early next year. What’s next?

Seth Coe Sullivan: In 2011, we’ll be launching a display product. It’s still a quantum light optic, but it’ll be augmenting LED light in the backlight of displays. We’re basically doing spectral engineering, designing the spectrum of a light source to be perfect for the application. With solid-state lighting, we are focusing on the human eye’s perception of white. With displays we’re focused on creating red, green, and blue, but in particular red and green color channels in LCD to give a high color gamut, high power efficiency, while again reducing cost because we’re saving manufacturers LEDs.

KG: So where does the optic fit in an LCD?

SCS: If you look at an LCD today, you’ll see that they typically use white LEDs as a backlight. It’s a blue chip with yellow phosphor. So what happens is you get this nice broad yellow peak that fills out the spectrum and make it look roughly white. Then what you’re doing is putting it through a color filter because you want separate red and green channels. There’s a little red light in the yellow phosphor, and there’s a little bit of green light in yellow phosphor, so what LCD manufacturers are doing is using really spectrally broad color filters to let as much light through as possible. It hurts color quality, or color gamut in this case.

KG: So quantum dots replace filters?

SCS: No, they’re still going to use filters, we’re just going to take out the yellow phosphor, which is adding very little value but solving a need, and adding red and green quantum dots. It’s still going to be white light, but it’s going to tri-chromatic white that’s optimized for filters to maximize the throughput through the filters, as opposed to bi-chromatic light that’s getting chopped into tri-chromatic by the filters.

KG: So if you did spectral analysis of your laptop backlight, it’d look blue and yellow?

SCS: Before the color filters, yeah.

KG: And then after the color filters it’s red, green, and blue?

SCS: Yeah. You’re taking this broad band and chopping it into pieces, and it’s extremely lossy. The white LEDs don’t put the photons where LCD really need it.

KG: How does this get integrated into manufacturing of an LCD.

SCS: Right now LCD makers buy white LEDs, integrate them into light bars, which is a bunch of LEDs on a strip, and those are coupled to the edge of a light guide plate which spreads the light. What we do is sell a quantum light optic that goes between the blue LEDs now and the light guide plate. So blue light gets converted into tri-chromatic white light and then gets couple into the light guide.

KG: They just have to buy blue LEDs instead of white LEDs with phosphor?

SCS: Yes. We aren’t selling the integrated LED. We’ll sell the optic.

KG: What sort of improvements can using a quantum light optic give to an LCD?

SCS: There’s a potential of 30 to 40 percent increase in power efficiency. Color gamut goes from about 80 percent of the standard gamut to over 100 percent. So all of a sudden your TV is as good as your CRT [cathode ray tube] was 10 years ago in terms of color. And there’s manufacturing cost savings to LCD makers, which is a big deal. Those guys operate at such thin margins, even giving them a few points is doubling their profitability potentially.

KG: Which LCD companies are you working with?

SCS: I can’t give any particular names, but we’re working with three of the five major LCD companies.

KG: It’s a clever to improve displays like this without  re-engineer the entire device.

SCS: The display industry is completely motivated by cost, so it’s got to be really simple. What’s so compelling for us is that the materials we’re developing in solid state lighting—the packaging, the technology, the manufacturing processes—are going to be identical. For a small company chewing off very big markets—and both lighting and displays are $100 billion markets—it’s important that there’s a lot of synergy in terms of processes, materials, and manufacturing.

KG: Lighting and displays both use quantum dots that are activated by light, not electric current. What about full quantum-dot displays that are powered by electricity?

SCS: They’ll largely be on the military side for the Department of Defense, where they’re willing to perhaps pay a little more to solve a critical life-saving need. We’ll do that as opposed to competing right up against LCD. The OLED [organic light-emitting diode] guys are learning just how hard that is. How many decades have they been going at it? They’ve got a compelling technology, but cost, manufacturing scale, and building fabs it’s hard to compete with LCD.

This is the second of two Q&As with Sullivan about QD Vision products. The first Q&A focused on improving lighting with quantum dots. For my story in Technology Review about quantum dots for LCDs, go here.

Improving the Look of LED Lighting

QD Vision, an MIT spinout, is commercializing quantum dots, tiny crystals that emit bright light of a particular color. Because quantum dots shine at specific colors, a layer of them can be added to an LED to alter its original color. This is exactly QD Vision’s first product: quantum dots that makes white LED lights, famous for their erie hue, look better.

The quantum dot lighting solution is relatively simple: Adding red quantum dots to a white LED makes the resulting white light appear warmer. Light from the LED gives electrons in the quantum dots an energetic boost for a short time; when the electrons return to their lower energy state, they emit a photon, a process called photoluminescence.  (Photoluminescence is in contrast to electroluminescence, in which electric current, not light, excites electrons.)

I caught up with the founder of QD Vision, Seth Coe Sullivan, at the Printed Electronics 2009 conference in San Jose last week to ask him a few questions about lighting. Below is an edited version of our conversation:

Kate Greene: What quantum dot products are you selling right now?

Seth Coe Sullivan, founder of QD Vision (front)

Seth Coe Sullivan, founder of QD Vision (front)

Seth Coe Sullivan: Today, we’re commercially shipping a quantum light optic. It’s essentially a light-emitting filter: a plate of glass with quantum dots printed on top. We sell it to a couple of customers. One is a fixture company, and one is a lamp company called Nexxus. They make Edisonian-mount lamps, so you can screw the lamp into the same mount you screw an incandescent bulb into. The Nexxus lamp used to have a diffuse filter plate on the top of it. With our product, they just take that plate out, and put the quantum light optic in its place. You get to transform the color without paying any price in terms of efficiency. You have the color of incandescent lighting with the efficiency of LED lighting.

KG: The optic is emissive, and so it doesn’t decrease efficiency like a filter?

SCS: Right. We’re using blue photons from the LEDs and making red photons from the quantum dots. In theory you could make the lamp four times as bright by going from blue to red. But we’re not using all the blue light from the LEDs. We’re just making a little bit of red to tweak the spectrum.

KG: Okay, give me a quick definition of quantum dots.

SCS: A quantum dot is a semiconductor nanocrystal that we synthesize in a chemical solution. When you make semiconductors very small, the quantum physics dominates the conventional semiconductor physics. So size matters. A quantum dot, made of the semiconductor cadmium selenide, that is six nanometers in size emits red light, one that’s four nanometers emits green, and one that’s two nanometers emits blue.

KG: How long have they been around?

SCS: They date back to the 80s. But there’s really been a series of improvements of efficiency and stability so that all of a sudden quantum dots have crossed the line in commercial relevance. The first applications were all in biology. They were used to tag sections of cells and other things. Then there was a Christmas tree light product that predated us. It’s neat, but it doesn’t provide any actual value to the world. Still, it was great to see them put something on the market.

KG: But in terms of a major commercial product, QD Vision has the first?

SCS: We really are the first to put something in a mainstream market where you’re adding value to the world. By making LED lighting, which is the most efficient lighting technology in the world, something that’s pleasing to consumers, all of a sudden you can drive adoption of LED technology.  LEDs make up less than one percent of lighting right now. Philips talks about it being 80 percent in 2020. That’s massive growth in the next 10 years, but in order for that to happen, people have to want to buy them. It’s not enough to be efficient. They have to look good too. We think we’ve solved that problem, and we’re talking to all the major players to build quantum light optics into their products.

KG: What’s the change in cost to add a quantum light optic?

SCS: It’s actually a reduction in their manufacturing cost. Nexxus is actually going to offer products at same price, but that just means they’ve improved their margins by increasing their efficiency. When you look at these things, you always need to do an apples-to-apples comparison. I’m comparing our product, with the high color quality that it has, with trying to make the same color quality with any other technology. Because we’re doing that with roughly 30 percent more efficiency, you’re using 30 percent fewer LEDs to produce the same number of lumens. By putting in a quantum light optic instead of 30 percent more LEDs, you take all that cost out. When you add the cost of quantum light optic in there and the net result should be reduction in main cost.

KG: Can I buy a quantum-dot light today?

SCS: Almost. We are shipping to our customers. Our customers then have to make a lamp or a fixture, sell them to their distributors, and then their distributors have to sell them to end customers who have to install them. Right now that hasn’t sold all the way through. For example, the Nexxus product will be the first quantum lighting product sold on bulbs.com. So probably in late January or early February you’ll be able to go to that site and purchase a Nexxus array lamp with a quantum light optic inside.

KG: Will it be expensive?

SCS: I’m told the retail price will probably be $100.

KG: How does that compare to other LED lighting?

SCS: It’s extremely competitive within LED lighting. LED costs more than other lighting technologies. An incandescent bulb of the type we’re talking about might be $3. A compact florescent might be between  $5 and $10, so a $100 light bulb is an investment. But this bulb isn’t meant for you and me, in our homes today.  It’s for people who look at total cost of ownership model when they install lighting. So if you’re a building owner, you look at the cost of bulb and also the electricity to run it, the maintenance cost to replace it,  and the future bulbs you’re going to have to buy. If you look at total 50,000-hour life of our product, you’ll need five compact florescent bulbs or 25 halogen or incandescent bulbs. Then you add in the cost of the guy climbing the ladder to change the bulb, it pays you back in 12 to 18 months.

KG: What’s next for quantum-dot lighting?

SCS: With existing customers, we will expand the product line offering. So we do that in terms of different colors temperatures offered. 2700 K is the temperature that describes what an incandescent bulb produces. That’s what we’re offering now. But we can also do 3000K, 3500K, 4100K products.

KG: Who are your other customers?

Seth Coe Sullivan (back)

Seth Coe Sullivan (back)

SCS: We’re working with all the lighting majors. Lighting is an extremely fragmented market. We do have a lot of different customers that are in the design cycle to launch products in 2010.

This is the first of two Q&As with Sullivan about QD Vision products. The second Q&A will focus on improving liquid-crystal displays with quantum dots.

Bringing Stretchable Silicon to Market

When I interview researchers about their projects, I usually ask for a product timeline. It’s not an entirely fair question because researchers rarely have much control over commercialization. It’s a boring question too because they usually answer, “three to five years.”  Still, I like to include these estimates in my stories to keep readers, many of whom aren’t familiar with R&D and product timelines, from getting too excited about the prospect of something like a quantum computer appearing under the Christmas tree.

Given the gap between research and commercialization, I’m excited to give an update on research I first covered in early 2006. A startup called MC10, based in Waltham, MA, will be making products from stretchable, single-crystalline silicon, the high-quality stuff that’s used in computer chips, within the next 18 months.

The great thing about stretchable single-crystalline silicon is that it can do anything chips can do now–sensing, processing, communicating–but it can do it in unusual shapes. Imagine a surgeon’s gloves that read a patient’s pH, a sheet of high-quality electrodes that can conform around the brain of a person with epilepsy, and a camera chip in the shape of an eye. Stretchable silicon can make these things happen.

There are other sorts of flexible electronics, but they are generally made of organic materials, which are printed or painted on flexible substrates. Organic electronics are easy to make, but aren’t as fast as silicon electronics.

MC10 is commercializing work from John Rogers’ group* at the University of Illinois. I wrote a story for Technology Review about the proof of principle: silicon becomes stretchy when it is thinned and cut into ribbons. These ribbons are then adhered to a rubber-like substrate that’s pre-stretched. When the rubber relaxes, the silicon forms waves, but does not crack. The rubber can be stretched and relaxed many times without degrading the silicon. Rogers showed the electrical properties of this wavy silicon are just as good as silicon on a rigid substrate.

stretchable silicon

Since this initial research, the group has made a number of working devices that can conform to different form factors and unusual shapes. David Icke, the head of MC10, gave a presentation at Printed Electronics 2009 on Thursday in which he provided an overview of stretchable silicon applications.

One project that the company will focus on is making skin for robots that perceives distance and senses pressure. Computer vision from cameras can get a robot hand only so far, Icke said. When it gets close to an object, it needs to adjust at a fine scale. Likewise, when a robot hand grabs an object, it needs to know the pressure it’s applying at all contact points. No one wants to be crushed between robot fingers.

After the talk, I caught up with Icke to ask exactly how they are adding perception to robot hands**. He says they’re building infrared emitters and sensors into a stretchable sheet that can be stretched over a robotic hand. The sensors pick up infrared light that’s scattered when it hits an object.

The early products, Icke says, will most likely be high-margin and low-volume. In other words, the company will focus on specialized gadgets, built for a specific customer, like spherical cameras for the U.S. military. So even though stretchable silicon products are on their way, it’ll be a while before you and I can get our hands on them.

*Rogers is a really nice guy, and one of the better science communicators I’ve ever come across. Rightfully, he was awarded a MacArthur Fellowship this year.

**Another way to add perception to a robot hand is being explored at Intel by Josh Smith. He’s built a robotic hand that detects an electric field, which is useful when in proximity to conducting materials like bottles of water or a human body. See a video here.

Printed Electronics 2009: DARPA Projects

Dev Shenoy, program manager at DARPA, gave a good keynote presentation at the Printed Electronics 2009 conference today, highlighting some of the printed electronics projects that the agency supports.

Printed Spintronic Memory: This project aims to replace all other types of data storage–magnetic hard disk, flash, DRAM, MRAM, SRAM, etc., with one type storage to rule them all. It’s called spin torque-transfer memory, or STT-RAM for short, and it uses the spin of electrons to store data. DARPA is supporting projects to print STT-RAM using organic materials–a first. The claim is that STT-RAM could be 100 times more energy-efficient than SRAM and 100,000 more energy efficient than flash.

Eye-shaped Camera: The curved shape of an eye is a great example of how a simple design provides exceptional performance. A flat camera sensor can’t match the field of view we have with our eyes. DARPA is interested in spherical cameras because one round camera could replace three flat cameras in an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), according to Shenoy. Since traditional chip manufacturing processes are done on flat surfaces, DARPA is trying to figure out a way to print camera components on a curved surface.
(I’ve written about related work on an eye-shaped camera here and an electronic contact lens here.)

Flexible X-ray: One problem with x-ray detectors are that they are expensive and too large to lug around on the battle field. So DARPA is funding projects (at PARC and GE) to print x-ray sensors on a flexible, lightweight sheet.

Printed Electronics 2009: Wearable Sensors

I’m at the 2009 Printed Electronics conference in San Jose today and tomorrow. Below are highlights from a talk about wearable sensors by Professor Joe Paradiso of MIT.

(Note: Paradiso gave the disclaimer that his projects are less about printed electronics and more about the cool things that can be done once electronics become more practical to print. Thus, these examples consist of rigid circuit boards.)

Sensor Network as Skin: It’s a bit clunky in this incarnation, but the idea is that a collection of multisensor nodes sense the environment and communicate with each other. If this can be shrunk down, it might make a good sort of artificial skin for robots.

SportSemble: This project puts sensors on the Boston Red Sox to track subtle movements as well as fast, dramatic movements. The technical challenge is to monitor such a large range of movements well–most sensors don’t give the range and precision at both ends of the movement spectrum. So the researchers kluged together two types of sensors. They hope the sensor pack can offer some insight into the way that athletes’ movements and body positions change over the course of a game.

Spinner: What if software could automatically edit video to fit a narrative structure? It would be useful for lifecasting, for sure. The project, called Spinner, uses video from cameras installed at the Media Lab and data from people who wear smart badges to keep track their activity and location. The researchers use software to pick out certain characteristics in the video and string it together. For instance, you could instruct the software to put together clips that show the Media Lab with bright light and low activity, clips of Sue at the Media Lab during low activity, and during high activity, and finally, clips of the Media Lab with darkness and low activity. As a bonus, the software matches a soundtrack to the video.

Copyright © kategreene.net
Science and Technology and Other Stuff

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress